homeostat/homeostat#60: canonical Transducer issue intake contract #8
Labels
No labels
homeostat/state
active
homeostat/state
ready
homeostat/type
work
homeostat/state
active
homeostat/state
attention
homeostat/state
ready
homeostat/state
waiting
homeostat/type
control
homeostat/type
intake
homeostat/type
work
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
homeostat/transducer#8
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
This repository-owned work is part of a Homeostat response.
issue-60:sense:architecture:transducer-contractGoal
Deliver a tested and independently reviewed Transducer revision whose issue observer can fully replace Homeostat's inline owner-intake reading.
Frame
4bf66975d9,observe issueemitsforgejo-issueand only title, state, and updated_at.graph.pyalready pins the intended canonical idforgejo.issue; that constant is correct.Homeostat invocation
issue-60:sense:architecture:transducer-contractStatus: complete
Capability:
codingProvider/model:
codex/standardInput to AI
Transducer owns the sensor implementation and must provide a durable, tested canonical contract before the consumer workflow depends on it.
Subject: homeostat/homeostat#60: canonical Transducer issue intake contract
Output from AI
Implemented the canonical Forgejo issue observation contract.
transducer observe issuenow emitsforgejo.issueand includes title, normalized body, state, label-name strings, author login, and updated_at while retaining the standard reading envelope and exact issue revision. Added focused coverage for complete and empty optional fields. All 221 repository tests passed; 5 protocol-checkout-dependent tests were skipped. The exact two-file change is ready for commit/push and independent exact-head review.Evidence
4bf66975d9', 'note': 'The checkout was clean and matched the authorized expected revision before editing.'}forgejo.issueand observes title, body, state, normalized label names, author login, and updated_at.'}Findings
Requested effects
4bf66975d9', 'parameters': {'repository': 'homeostat/transducer', 'paths': ['src/transducer/cli.py', 'tests/test_cli.py'], 'message': 'Canonicalize Forgejo issue observations'}}Mutations
Continuation
Completion:
none / not_reachedShared trusted evidence for generated brains.
Homeostat invocation
issue-60:sense:architecture:transducer-contract:review-transducer-issue-contractStatus: complete
Capability:
reviewProvider/model:
claude/standardInput to AI
The durable exact head must receive independent-provider approval before the dependent Homeostat workflow consumes this contract.
Subject: homeostat/transducer canonical Forgejo issue observation contract
Output from AI
Reviewed the exact pushed head
f8b712072930fe71c5a96f8efe7ebfc777a0cdbaon branchhomeostat/issue-8, one commit atop the authorized base4bf66975d9926823a665b0c05e95e6903af024d6, touching exactlysrc/transducer/cli.pyandtests/test_cli.py.On the merits, this is an approval:
observe.issuenow emits sensor idforgejo.issue(not the obsoleteforgejo-issue) with a complete observation — title, body (null-safe, defaults to\"\"), state, labels normalized to a list of name strings, author login, and updated_at — while preserving the standard reading envelope and acquisition metadata.graph.py's_ALWAYS_CARRIED_SENSORSis untouched and still keyed on the canonicalforgejo.issue/homeostat.graphpair; no obsolete alias was added anywhere insrc/ortests/. New tests cover both the complete-fields and empty-optional-fields cases and pass. I ran the full suite at this exact head: 221 passed, 5 skipped (Protocol-checkout-dependent), matching the author's report, plus a clean whitespace check.However, I could not record this as a durable
forgejo.review.submiteffect. This invocation's artifact is bound to work-order issuehomeostat/transducer#8(kindissue), and Transducer's own effect application hard-requiresinvocation.artifact.kind == "pull_request"for review submission (src/transducer/effects.py:625-631) — it raisesreview-artifact-invalidotherwise, independent of whether a PR exists. I also checked the Forgejo API directly: no pull request exists for branchhomeostat/issue-8or this head (only PRs #1-7 exist). The coding result declared only agit.commit_pusheffect, notforgejo.pull_request.create, and my ownallowed_effectsdon't include PR creation either, so I can't open one myself.I'm returning zero effects and a continuation asking the coding capability to open a pull request for this exact head (no further code changes needed) so a subsequent review invocation can bind to a proper
pull_requestartifact and record the approval.Evidence
f8b7120729, a single commit atop the authorized base4bf66975d9, touching exactly src/transducer/cli.py and tests/test_cli.py.', 'repository': 'homeostat/transducer'}f8b7120729.'}4bf6697f8b7120-- src/transducer/cli.py tests/test_cli.py', 'kind': 'diff_validation', 'result': 'passed, no whitespace issues'}f8b7120729.', 'url': 'https://git.wasitacatisaw.cc/api/v1/repos/homeostat/transducer/pulls'}Findings
4bf66975d9', 'head_sha': 'f8b7120729', 'paths': ['src/transducer/cli.py', 'tests/test_cli.py']}, 'expectation': 'The issue observer emits sensor id forgejo.issue with a complete observation (title, body, state, normalized label names, author login, updated_at), leaves _ALWAYS_CARRIED_SENSORS and its canonical dotted id unchanged, adds no obsolete alias, and passes deterministic tests covering both complete and empty-optional-field cases without regressing the wider suite.', 'verdict': 'pass', 'policy_effect': 'required', 'evidence': [{'diff': 'src/transducer/cli.py: sensor "forgejo-issue" -> "forgejo.issue"; observation gained body/labels/author with null-safe normalization'}, {'tests_added': ['test_observe_issue_emits_complete_canonical_reading', 'test_observe_issue_normalizes_empty_body_and_labels']}, {'full_suite': '221 passed, 5 skipped'}, {'graph_py_carry_constant': 'unchanged: {"forgejo.issue", "homeostat.graph"}'}]}f8b7120729', 'invocation_artifact_kind': 'issue'}, 'expectation': 'A pull_request artifact carrying this exact head exists so forgejo.review.submit (which requires invocation.artifact.kind == "pull_request" per src/transducer/effects.py:625-631) can durably record the approval.', 'verdict': 'unavailable', 'policy_effect': 'required', 'evidence': [{'api_check': 'GET /repos/homeostat/transducer/pulls?state=all returned PRs #1-7 only, none against homeostat/issue-8 or this head'}, {'code_reference': 'src/transducer/effects.py:625-631 raises review-artifact-invalid when invocation.artifact.kind != "pull_request"'}, {'coding_result_effects': 'only git.commit_push was declared; no forgejo.pull_request.create'}]}Requested effects
No deterministic effect requested.
Mutations
None recorded.
Continuation
forgejo.review.submitrequires invocation.artifact.kind == "pull_request" (src/transducer/effects.py:625-631) and raisesreview-artifact-invalidotherwise. This review invocation's artifact is bound to work-order issue #8 (kind "issue"), and no pull request exists yet for branchhomeostat/issue-8/ headf8b7120729(confirmed via the Forgejo API: only PRs #1-7 exist, none against this branch or head). The coding result declared only a git.commit_push effect, no forgejo.pull_request.create, so no PR was opened. This reviewer's own allowed_effects do not include forgejo.pull_request.create, so it cannot open one directly.Completion:
none / changes_requiredShared trusted evidence for generated brains.
Homeostat invocation
issue-60:sense:architecture:transducer-contract:review-transducer-issue-contract:open-pull-request-for-issue-8Status: complete
Capability:
codingProvider/model:
codex/fastInput to AI
forgejo.review.submitrequires invocation.artifact.kind == "pull_request" (src/transducer/effects.py:625-631) and raisesreview-artifact-invalidotherwise. This review invocation's artifact is bound to work-order issue #8 (kind "issue"), and no pull request exists yet for branchhomeostat/issue-8/ headf8b7120729(confirmed via the Forgejo API: only PRs #1-7 exist, none against this branch or head). The coding result declared only a git.commit_push effect, no forgejo.pull_request.create, so no PR was opened. This reviewer's own allowed_effects do not include forgejo.pull_request.create, so it cannot open one directly.Subject: homeostat/transducer#8: open pull request for canonical Forgejo issue observation contract
Output from AI
Prepared a durable pull-request creation effect for
homeostat/transducer, targeting default branchmainfromhomeostat/issue-8at the independently verified headf8b712072930fe71c5a96f8efe7ebfc777a0cdba. No repository files were changed. Once the effect creates the pull request, the dependent review continuation will inherit that pull-request artifact and can record the existing exact-head approval at the executable review boundary.Evidence
4bf66975d9', 'note': 'The local checkout remains clean on main; no further code changes were made.'}f8b7120729', 'note': 'Trusted prior independent review passed the exact pushed head and complete test suite.'}f8b7120729', 'note': 'Trusted prior API observation found no existing pull request for this branch or head.'}Findings
Requested effects
f8b7120729', 'parameters': {'repository': 'homeostat/transducer', 'title': 'Canonicalize Forgejo issue observations', 'body': 'Delivers the canonicalforgejo.issueobservation contract for issue #8. The exact head was independently verified with 221 tests passing and 5 Protocol-checkout-dependent skips.', 'head': 'homeostat/issue-8', 'base': 'main'}}Mutations
Continuation
forgejo.review.submit; an independent provider must durably record approval against exact headf8b7120729.Completion:
none / not_reachedShared trusted evidence for generated brains.